Wednesday, September 29, 2010
New Ideas are Intriguing
The idea that African-Americans used music as a way to voice their opinions and give themselves a voice. The idea that music is a good way to display emotion and culture is not a new one. In fact people have been doing this since music had been created. What's more interesting to me is the fact that this was the African-American community's only means of having their voices heard. They wrote novels and had memoirs at the time of course, but it wasn't reaching nearly as far an audience as their swing music movement did. By adopting swing culture as their own, the white community took one step closer to integration, a move I know many of the white community did not want, but it was a necessary step towards equal rights. That's what I found most interesting about this past week's readings and classes. Plus the music is fantastic....
whose expression?
Tricia Rose, in her novel Black Noise, states, “Rap music is a black cultural expression that prioritizes black voices from the margins of North America.” Although black artists may have developed and progressed this art form, I feel that other groups (ethnic, class, etc.) have adopted this medium to express their hardships. Specifically I know that the rap scene in Native communities is growing, and many of their songs are about their peoples’ histories and the current struggles of a Native person in a predominantly white world.
Artists Without Say Keep Saying
Swing's iImpact on the youth
Music, music, music
Respect for Rapp
Rap music : Good or Bad?
Rap and the portrayal of race
Afrosimilation
Swing
Hip Hop
Telling a Story
In "Black noise: rap music and black culture in contemporary America" by Tricia Rose, she explains how others view rap music and how it is in society today. Her descriptions bother me honestly. I think that the way she describes women rappers are "rare pro-women lyricists." I find that very odd when I think that most women rappers are all very strong, independent women and are certainly looked at in that way. Another thing I don’t agree with is how she describes male rappers only speak about gang life, drug dealing, or attack other males for a sense of security. I think rappers, black or white, just tell a story. Whether those things might be included in their story, they are true and that why people like them. They are interested because they can either relate, or because it is a lifestyle they know nothing about. I liked her chapter but I just think she does a lot of generalization and rappers don’t portray their lives through music to be similar to others, I think they do it to be different.
Meaning in babel?
Women as objects
Rap Music Effects in Society
Story Telling
Rap and Popular Culture
Superficial Trends
Rap and Race
Rap and African American Culture
Rap/Hip-Hop and the Media
Hip Hop, Race, and Gender
Black "Noise"
Rap Music
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Race
Or she may really not know how to spell black.
Racial Portrayal of Rap and Hip-hop
Female Rappers
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Stereotypes from Way Back Then
Racism
Ideologically Relevant
What is race?
Past or Future?
Living in the Ghetto
Racial Formations
Riverbeds and Railways.
Black history
History Repeats Itself
Racial Formation
Rap Discussion Question
A "new " Voice
Agency
Discussion
Discussion Question
Before anyone comments on this claiming that I'm endorsing slavery, safe your breath, I'm clearly not. I'm just posing a question I have been thinking about since I took world civ I. Would I single handedly remove the wrongs of the past to bring hell on the people currently?
May the N-Word rest in peace?
Equality by Malcolm X
Noisy Messages, Or Just Noise?
In Chapter 3, "African Americans," a discussion of New Black Voices describes how people try, with new mediums of pop culture, to express their beliefs. Chuck D, of "Public Enemy," describes his goal as: "I'm trying to alert as many people as possible and that's why on my records I like to put noise on them. I consider them an alarm for Black-Americans." Do you think this form of expression and awareness is useful? Or do you think audiences focus more on the way these messages are portrayed (advertising, music videos, album covers) rather than the messages themselves? If you think audiences do receive these messages, and are not distracted by the “noise” in which they are delivered, are they being put to use?
ps- the text is getting a little better...
Tomorrow's Discussion
Have a great day everyone!
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
African American
Generations of Racism
Black History today
Free Weezy
What's Race Got To Do With It?
Friday, September 17, 2010
koh.02
It's incredible to know that even in the 80's, the Louisiana government refused to change Susie Guillory Phipp's racial classification from "black to white". A law from the 70's (which is extremely backward) states that "anyone with at least 1/32 'Negro blood' is constituted as 'black'. Who is to judge one's race except for themselves? Take a look at Brazil. Brazilian racial classification is based on self-classification and is established on physical appearance and not of hereditary traits, leading to self "whitening".
Omi and Winant writes, "Once we understand that race overflows the boundaries of skin color, super-exploitation, social stratification, discrimination and prejudice, cultural domination and cultural resistance... it becomes possible to speak of racial formation." Racial formation, being, the realization that race is a social construct and nothing more... Unfortunately for the world, ignorant people will continue to use race as a biological concept to create false ideas of superiority over certain groups of human beings.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Running on Indian Time
The massacre at Wounded Knee is a violent reality in the continued push of Manifest Destiny and the American hope of conquering the west. Although, this was also the same time that the formation of “Indian schools” had begun, which marked the beginning of more crimes against Native children.
Past to Present
Irish Immigrants
Social Construction
Native American and tranformation...
Irish Immigration
The Irish Emmigration
Hard Working Irish
koh.01
Freedom?
The Irish
The Irish Exodus
The Good of Immigration
Immigratoin is what provides the backbone of the country. I am here because my grandparents came from Ireland. If they hadn't faced discrimination and stayed here, I wouldnt have the opportunities that I do today. After hearing their story, I was able to see that immigration is what made up so much of our country. They took all the hard jobs and grind that peoplealready here wouldn't do. This is a major reason why even today we should accept the people that want to come to our country because it can help us in the long run.
The Immigration Question
Ironic
Irish Emigration and "Assimilation"
I thought this gave good insight into the background of the whole Irish influx during the 18 and 19oos. These were worn down people with oppression in their blood and nothing but hope for a better tomorrow, along with whatever money they had sewn into their pockets. It only makes sense that once in America these people took full advantage of all that the states had to offer. When people in your homeland are pushed to subsist on potatoes and grass, any change of pace is a welcome relief. It was interesting to read how Irish women, who emigrated in larger numbers than the men, created their own place in the workforce, dominating the maid market.
These resilient people were able to take oppression and a devastating blight and turn it into a success story. Many could even argue that the story of the Irish is one of the best examples of a people achieving the American dream.
A Journey
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Native Americans
Irish Immigrants
Assimilation
The chapter said assimilation was not possible because customs and traditions of Native Americans were “too alien.” How does that even make sense? To assimilate something is to make it adjust and/or adapt to a different way. If America was so “new,” then how were there already standards, rules, and regulations for it? Racial inequality is something I feel very strongly about and I find egocentrism to be very unacceptable. I do not necessarily agree or disagree with the author, considering I believe that he is only stating facts, not opinion. “The reservation policy aimed to ensure that Native Americans would be systematically educated and ‘civilised’ into the American way of life.” Everyone tried so hard to change the way people were to make them “White Americans.” When no one can really even define what that really is. Native Americans had to suffer the loss of their culture, tradition, self-belief and many other things. To look back on it now, I think assimilation is something that is unfair. You shouldn’t have to make someone, or a group of people, change the way they are in order for them to live somewhere.
Irish Immigrants
Wounded Knee
Racisim
Stylistic Issues
I will not quote the entire passage but basically from page 31 paragraph 3 and downward in that same paragraph the author essentially just talks a lot about something that could easily be explained in lamens terms. He or she seems to have the need to make simple things MUCH more complex then they really are. In this passage the author is talking about the myths this country has come to adore. Naturally, the author makes this sort of assertion "...Of course, we must suspect such a discourse and interrogate its operation, ideologies, assumptions and exclusions." Firstly, this presents two problems. Firstly, this implies that leaders using these sort of myths are doing so in almost a malicious manner in which to persuade otherwise disassimilated inviduals to join some sort of "american only" ideal. Secondly, and more importantly, it implies that anyone cared. I'm not sure about the rest of the world, but I wouldn't just assume everything being presented in front of me was true, espicially about undoubtably unverifiable facts considering the time period and those presenting the facts. It's truly mind boggling to me that anyone would read a text from one of original voyages to america and just accept it as absolute fact. I find this sort of text almost insulting. This author presents these sort of "revolutionary" skepitc notions about stories past in a manner which is purposefully hard to understand. What is difficult about doubting a 15th century account of an imperialistic adventure?
To be fair, I'm not sure if it's truly the author or if there really is that many naive people in this country, but long story barely shorter, this book feels like it's talking down to me about something I already know.
Turning to America
"'hunger' to posses the dream, to be taken up by America". Even though they are looked down upon by most Americans and payed low wages, they still believe it's better. Yezierska believed that education would open their possibilities of social change, leading to economic change. To turn America into a "transnationality" to create all equal. The author also said "Ethnicity in America is precisely this blend of antagonism and coalescence, a mix if different voices struggling to be heard, some restricted and silenced, whilst other dominate, and yet always with the possibility of finding expression and authority."